Log in
Current Version: v0.0.01A
Alpha version
Changelogs to come
Latest topics
Version Progress
Changes for v0.02.0A||||||||||||||||||||[●] [general]
||||||||||||||||||||[●] [Heroes]
||||||||||||||||||||[●] [Items]
||||||||||||||||||||[●] [Bugs]
||||||||||||||||||||[●] [Total]
About Discussions/arguments
Page 1 of 1
About Discussions/arguments
The purpose of this forum is to have people comment and discussed any proposed changes/remakes/suggestions. while the easiset way to do this is simply to say "gj man! 5/5 fo sure!" this kind of comment leads to nothing.
I encourage people to post criticisms on other peoples suggestions. Weather good or bad, it will help the suggestion develop and become something that might actually make it into the map.
-note to suggesters, not all critisism is bad, and those people that just bash a suggestion will be warned/have their post deleated. people who criticise only want to see the suggestion improve, so work *with* them rather then *against* them to improve your suggestion. simply disagreeing with all posters will lead to nothing, causing your suggestion to *probably* not make it into the map
While I encourage discussion, i realise that discussions may eventually lead to arguments. There are a few things to realise about arguments:
-no one 'wins' an arguemnt. it will inevitably lead to an 'im right, your wong' personal thing.
-if you must argue, it should be about comming to an agreed consensus, you are arguing to reach a point, not to win
if I (or any mods) see this kind of argument, I(they) will tell you to stop at once, and if it continues, we have permission to start deleating posts.
I encourage people to post criticisms on other peoples suggestions. Weather good or bad, it will help the suggestion develop and become something that might actually make it into the map.
-note to suggesters, not all critisism is bad, and those people that just bash a suggestion will be warned/have their post deleated. people who criticise only want to see the suggestion improve, so work *with* them rather then *against* them to improve your suggestion. simply disagreeing with all posters will lead to nothing, causing your suggestion to *probably* not make it into the map
While I encourage discussion, i realise that discussions may eventually lead to arguments. There are a few things to realise about arguments:
-no one 'wins' an arguemnt. it will inevitably lead to an 'im right, your wong' personal thing.
-if you must argue, it should be about comming to an agreed consensus, you are arguing to reach a point, not to win
if I (or any mods) see this kind of argument, I(they) will tell you to stop at once, and if it continues, we have permission to start deleating posts.
_________________
warning! very-stubborn, sarcastic, self-important, argumentative developer detected!
And unto the masses, He doth spoke:
"Behold The Stuff! It Is Good!"
And the Stuff was good.
Heroes:
Commander Farsight (colab - implemented) - Ku'gaath Plaguefather(incomplete) - Ilyana Arienal(incomplete) - Harlequin Shadowseer(incomplete) - Modular Tau Battlesuit(sandbox)
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
» Faction creeps
» [SCII] [Inquisition] Hector Rex
» [necrons] Orikan, the Diviner
» Talent System
» Capture Points system
» [SCII] [Orks] Warboss(es)
» Game Guide
» [Inquisition] Mordrak
» [inquiition] Kaldor Draigo