Log in
Current Version: v0.0.01A
Alpha version
Changelogs to come
Latest topics
Version Progress
Changes for v0.02.0A||||||||||||||||||||[●] [general]
||||||||||||||||||||[●] [Heroes]
||||||||||||||||||||[●] [Items]
||||||||||||||||||||[●] [Bugs]
||||||||||||||||||||[●] [Total]
Comments on 0.43.
3 posters
Page 1 of 1
Comments on 0.43.
- Cyclic Ion Blaster will be changed, as noted.
- Tooltips need to be modified and shortened & Spelling and Grammar fixed for the most part
- There needs to be bigger shops for items or shorter and more detailed tech trees for each item.
- 1 more Strength and 1 more Agility end-game weapon need to be suggested.
- Items in general need to be diversified and upgraded.
For example:The table isn't finished yet.
Weapons Armors Accessories Chaos Blastmaster, Doom Siren, Sonic Blaster, Blood Feeder, Plague Bringer, Bliss Giver, Drach'nyen, Bedlam Staff, Rod of Torment, Black Staff of Ahriman etc Chirurgeon Mark of Chaos Ascendant - All implemented heroes need to be normalized in some way. All heroes who don't have an innate should receive one. Also, some heroes will receive a necessary nerf, like Autarch, and some heroes will get buffed, like Warboss.
- Neutral Creeps need a change of pace; Any ideas?
- Warphead needs to kill himself much less.
- We need to dig up new models eventually for characters.
Further things will be added.
- All implemented heroes need to be normalized in some way. All heroes who don't have an innate should receive one. Also, some heroes will receive a necessary nerf, like Autarch, and some heroes will get buffed, like Warboss.
Glycine- Moderator
- Posts : 1490
Join date : 2009-07-23
Re: Comments on 0.43.
umm. why is this in heroes?
i cant do bigger shops D:
all implemented heroes do have innates as of this version, they're all the same.
(why does warboss need buffing? o.o)
i cant do bigger shops D:
all implemented heroes do have innates as of this version, they're all the same.
(why does warboss need buffing? o.o)
Re: Comments on 0.43.
Whoops. This is here. Could you move it to regular suggestions? xD;;
Have Warboss's skills changed to scale with level and stats or are they still base damage?
Have Warboss's skills changed to scale with level and stats or are they still base damage?
Glycine- Moderator
- Posts : 1490
Join date : 2009-07-23
Re: Comments on 0.43.
well, it would be... possible but very annoying to scale them, and he would prolly suffer more earlygame for it.
also, that being said, whenever ive palyed warboss i did pretty rape
also, that being said, whenever ive palyed warboss i did pretty rape
Re: Comments on 0.43.
If that's the case, Warboss should be fine.
What I meant by balancing heroes is that we need to audit each hero as a community (A list of all heroes present in-game would be a start xD) so that we can try to get heroes right on the first or second try, instead of waiting lots of patches to fix the riggedness.
What I meant by balancing heroes is that we need to audit each hero as a community (A list of all heroes present in-game would be a start xD) so that we can try to get heroes right on the first or second try, instead of waiting lots of patches to fix the riggedness.
Glycine- Moderator
- Posts : 1490
Join date : 2009-07-23
Re: Comments on 0.43.
yeah that would be ideal.
but u have to remeber that not everyone in the community knows what theyre talking about.
but u have to remeber that not everyone in the community knows what theyre talking about.
Re: Comments on 0.43.
Ehh, everyone knows a little... Also, buildings inside the base should do something to affect the gameplay instead of being there for creepbait.
Glycine- Moderator
- Posts : 1490
Join date : 2009-07-23
Re: Comments on 0.43.
Yeah, Warboss doesn't really need a buff... just needs to be more fun to play as
That being said, a list of in game heroes wouldn't be a bad idea.
Also, Grass, I think you should make a special forum-section made up of the people whom you personally think would be good at debating balance issues, and have them make, and I hate to word it this way, a hero tier list, then try to find ways to even up those tiers.
I mean, it is very easy to see that Asurmen and Bloodthirster are two of the better heroes at the moment, but who's under them? That's where debates start.
That being said, a list of in game heroes wouldn't be a bad idea.
Also, Grass, I think you should make a special forum-section made up of the people whom you personally think would be good at debating balance issues, and have them make, and I hate to word it this way, a hero tier list, then try to find ways to even up those tiers.
I mean, it is very easy to see that Asurmen and Bloodthirster are two of the better heroes at the moment, but who's under them? That's where debates start.
Fromundaman- Moderator
- Posts : 910
Join date : 2009-07-24
Re: Comments on 0.43.
well, as of right now, a good majority of people here know what their talking about...
no thats a lie... but what your talking about is basically a real beta testing team
no thats a lie... but what your talking about is basically a real beta testing team
Re: Comments on 0.43.
I'm sure we can arrange for that to be organized.
Glycine- Moderator
- Posts : 1490
Join date : 2009-07-23
Re: Comments on 0.43.
Well, a lot of people would qualify for beta testers.
What I am talking about is a concept I stole from Smashboards, in which the most knowledgeable discuss important things (On smashboards it's stuff like bans, rulesets, and tier lists.). I was thinking make it tier lists and character balancing for us. The tier lists would, I believe, help for balancing, because before we decide who needs buffing and nerfing, we kind of need to decide who is better and in what aspects.
That being said, we could indeed do it here instead. *shrugs*
What I am talking about is a concept I stole from Smashboards, in which the most knowledgeable discuss important things (On smashboards it's stuff like bans, rulesets, and tier lists.). I was thinking make it tier lists and character balancing for us. The tier lists would, I believe, help for balancing, because before we decide who needs buffing and nerfing, we kind of need to decide who is better and in what aspects.
That being said, we could indeed do it here instead. *shrugs*
Fromundaman- Moderator
- Posts : 910
Join date : 2009-07-24
Re: Comments on 0.43.
I can make a quick list right now.
Bloodthirster
Asurmen
Autarch
Mad Doc
Chapter Master
Lord of Change
Fuegan
Zoey
Celestine
Grand Master
Keeper of Secrets
Lucius
Typhus
Kharn
Carnifex
Flayed One
Necron Lord
Mistress of Death
Karandras
Farseer
Avatar
Harlequin
Chaplain
Pathfinder
Librarian
Warlord
Runt Herd
Big Mek
Warphead
Psyker
Let the discussion begin.
Bloodthirster
Asurmen
Autarch
Mad Doc
Chapter Master
Lord of Change
Fuegan
Zoey
Celestine
Grand Master
Keeper of Secrets
Lucius
Typhus
Kharn
Carnifex
Flayed One
Necron Lord
Mistress of Death
Karandras
Farseer
Avatar
Harlequin
Chaplain
Pathfinder
Librarian
Warlord
Runt Herd
Big Mek
Warphead
Psyker
Let the discussion begin.
Glycine- Moderator
- Posts : 1490
Join date : 2009-07-23
Re: Comments on 0.43.
Well I meant more in depth, because the list changes very drastically throughout early, mid, and late game (For example, Psycher and Warp are much better early game than say Karandras or Lucius, but late game Karandras and Lucius would both be near the top of the list.)
Also, they are all in different categories, like Warphead is a better hero killer than Doc, but Doc is better support. Runt is shit at hero killing, but a good pusher, etc.
I'm actually thinking of making one with excel XD
Finally, while there are many parts of that list I personally disagree with, the main thing is Zoey is way too high for an 'overall' list considering how badly he poops out late game.
Also, they are all in different categories, like Warphead is a better hero killer than Doc, but Doc is better support. Runt is shit at hero killing, but a good pusher, etc.
I'm actually thinking of making one with excel XD
Finally, while there are many parts of that list I personally disagree with, the main thing is Zoey is way too high for an 'overall' list considering how badly he poops out late game.
Fromundaman- Moderator
- Posts : 910
Join date : 2009-07-24
Re: Comments on 0.43.
The list isn't in order. It's just a list of heroes. xD Feel free to arrange them however you wish.
Glycine- Moderator
- Posts : 1490
Join date : 2009-07-23
Re: Comments on 0.43.
Oh!
Haha, that makes more sense then.
You know, seeing Bloodthirster and Asurmen at the top and Psycher at the bottom just made me assume
Haha, that makes more sense then.
You know, seeing Bloodthirster and Asurmen at the top and Psycher at the bottom just made me assume
Fromundaman- Moderator
- Posts : 910
Join date : 2009-07-24
Re: Comments on 0.43.
lmao, im working on a forum for just what were talking about here. give me a while and ill have it up
and wiat, u think psyker sucks? o.o
and wiat, u think psyker sucks? o.o
Re: Comments on 0.43.
Well, I haven't played him in 0.43, but in 0.42, while he was good early game, and good support, he was not exactly a good hero.
I don't know if I'd put him as THE worst, but he's down there late game (Early game he is really good though.).
I don't know if I'd put him as THE worst, but he's down there late game (Early game he is really good though.).
Fromundaman- Moderator
- Posts : 910
Join date : 2009-07-24
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Thu Mar 05, 2020 5:09 am by Occuli.Imperator.Aquillon
» Faction creeps
Sun Dec 21, 2014 12:49 am by Grass Hopper
» [SCII] [Inquisition] Hector Rex
Thu Dec 18, 2014 9:06 am by Grass Hopper
» [necrons] Orikan, the Diviner
Tue Dec 16, 2014 5:58 pm by Grass Hopper
» Talent System
Mon Dec 15, 2014 10:59 am by Grass Hopper
» Capture Points system
Fri Dec 12, 2014 2:36 pm by Grass Hopper
» [SCII] [Orks] Warboss(es)
Fri Dec 12, 2014 11:44 am by Grass Hopper
» Game Guide
Thu Dec 11, 2014 2:12 pm by Grass Hopper
» [Inquisition] Mordrak
Wed Dec 10, 2014 3:28 pm by Grass Hopper
» [inquiition] Kaldor Draigo
Wed Dec 10, 2014 3:07 pm by Grass Hopper